Category: Opinion

  • Cruxshadows

    The Crüxshadows have a new single coming out!

    What, you’ve never heard of The Crüxshadows? Well, you must not be listening to Darkwave music. I confess that I, myself, do not listen to Darkwave music, with the exception of The Crüxshadows. However, they produce some excellent tunes which I’m more than happy to slap my ears on. In fact, they currently reside in the top 5 of our Most Albums by the Same Artist category for the house.

    Crowdsurfing StormtrooperWe’ve seen the Cruxshadows most frequently at Dragon*Con, proud sponsor of the Crowd Surfing Stormtrooper, seen at left. We are looking forward to seeing them again, this Labor Day weekend.

    If you buy any of their albums, buy their most recent one, Dreamcypher. That is their strongest complete album to date. Not that they don’t have treasures in the others. There’s good music all around.

  • "Wanted"

    Jenn and I saw “Wanted” this evening. I’m sure our primary motivation to see this was Angelina Jolie, which shows what sort of literary taste we have.

    Verdict: Not bad, but definitely not good. It’s a bloody action film with lots of un-ponderable and questionably crazy action bits. Doff your skeptic hat before you walk through the door and you’ll be fine.

    If you’ve seen any of the previews then you know that this is about a group of assassins who are just so damn good that they can bend the flight of bullets by flinging their arms around while firing their weapons. My radar pinged on that one a bit because don’t bullets spin rapidly already? But I put that out of my mind. The only tooth-grinding unrealistic moment for me was when a passenger train car goes sliding down a gorge with it’s ends grinding against opposite rock walls and ends up stopping, intact and upright, before hitting the bottom. But, I took off my hat before going in, so I was ok.

    Should you see it? Probably not in the theaters. Rent it. Much better to save the money to see “Hancock” twice.

    Aren’t you glad you’ve got me who will go see these movies even knowing they will maybe suck?

  • Bad Movies!

    I watched In the Name of the King last night, a movie that I was fully aware was supposed to be horribly bad. I still wanted to see it, despite the reviews, just to say I’d seen it and fully experienced its badness. If you feel the same way I did, that you just have to see the movie, I encourage you to resist.

    The entertaining moments in this film are entertaining due to their “what the fuck is up with that?” factor rather than any contribution they make to the plot or story. The spinning-twirling-choreographed tree-ninjas are one such item, as are the amazonian cirque du soleil vine people. Also, it’s important to remember than if you’re going to go all bad-ass and place yourself in the catapult’s launch bucket, it’s much more fun to do it while on fire.

    Burt Reynolds (Smokey Himself!) is the King and must have been stoned off his ass when he agreed to take this part. Leelee Sobieski has a speaking part in the movie although I’m not yet certain what her role was. She doesn’t even show much leg skin, which was disappointing. Jason Statham is the star and does a normal amount of ass-kicking, although the development of his ass-kicking-ness ability is handwaved away (he’s a farmer, after all, and always was). Ray Liotta has demonstrated that he’ll take any part, no matter how terrible, and Matthew Lilliard reprises his role from Scream with much derring-do but little resolution.

    I saw it, now I can move on.

    Speaking of bad movies, here’s a revised script of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal OH MY GOD PLEASE LET IT STOP Skull.

  • Further Schooling

    Open Question:

    If you had sufficient time to devote to full-time graduate school, or just full-time study in the Gentleman Scholar type of framework, what would you study? We are assuming here that you haven’t burned yourself out already on, or sworn a blood oath about avoiding, advanced academic degrees.

    I think I’d have to go for history. Probably something technology-centric. I really don’t have any desire to go back to school to specialize my technical skills any more than they already are.

    You?

  • Gales of Laughter

    I made a huge mistake at 12:55 this afternoon. I checked the Whatever and saw that John Scalzi is running a contest. He is asking for creative hate mail to include on the rear cover of his latest book “Your Hate Mail will be Graded.” In that entry, he linked to an entry he’d posted in 2002 concerning the content of the hate mail he receives and ways in which it could be improved to be more interesting to him, the receiver. My mistake was to read this 2002 entry. From 12:57 to 1:05 I was causing myself serious stomach distress by trying to hold in the gales of laughter which would have brought the rest of the office to my door. I had a coworker call from over his cubicle wall, “Are you ok?” after a snort had escaped my control.

    This was honestly the funniest thing I’ve read in months. Maybe years.

  • Random TV Shoutout -or- One of the Best TV Show Episodes Ever

    Whoah Nelly! This post has been sitting around since January. Time to get it out the door. Parts are less timely, because Doctor Who season 3 is nearly over, but the meat of the post is still relevant.

    If you read my blog, you probably don’t need me to tell you that the latest edition of Doctor Who is in its third season (in the US). I’ve been liking the show, although I think season three is much better than the other two (yet I miss Christopher Eccelston from season one). I haven’t been making it a habit to watch each show. More or less I watch it if Jenn is watching it, which means I’ve caught about a third of them.

    This has changed since I watched last week’s Doctor Who episode entitled “Blink” and was totally blown away. It was a suspenseful episode which gave me the same creepy-eerie feeling I had when I saw the original “Fly” from the 50’s. It was spectacularly well blocked and shot, and this has been recognized by the Hugo Nomination Process because “Blink” is one of the nominees for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form.

    It deserves it. Even if you don’t know like Doctor Who, you’ll probably like this episode.

  • Post Office Bullshit

    Allow me to preface this post by stating that I believe I’m a relatively smart, modern, with-it kind of person; I have the ability to both accept and give instruction in a manner that leads to good outcomes. However, the post office system confuses the hell out of me. I never know what “level” of mail to use and it seems that “First Class” doesn’t exist any more. It’s “Priority” or “Express” or others which I can’t describe. This is a failing of mine, I realize: my inability to comprehend the American postal service.

    I have recently started participating in Paperback Swap, an online service for exchanging books. The upshot is, you pay for postage on books you send to people, and then you request books from others which arrive at no cost to you. Your total outlay is on postage purchased1. One of the things that the service does is suggest the postage necessary for mailing the book Parcel Post via the US Postal Service, intending, I guess, for you to slap on some stamps and away it goes. This would work well except that you must hand the package to a USPS Representative in order to send packages using parcel post; I can’t dump it into the convenient package slot next to the 24/7 automated kiosk. That’s a problem. Also, the suggested $2.23 postage from Paperback Swap doesn’t jive with the USPS’s costs for a minimum-weight parcel post package ($4.55).

    Aha! But now there’s this new thing called Media Mail—which might not be new but it’s new to me—that I can use. Apparently it’s bottom price for something the size of a paperback is $2.23, so mystery solved. That still leaves the issue of needing to hand it over the counter to a USPS customer service person, which is another issue entirely and might kill my participation in the Paperback Swap program, but what I’m really here to bitch about are these signs.

    Post Office Self Service Kisosk sign.  This reads: Attention: 13-Ounce Rule.  Stamped Mail over 13 Ounces Prohibited.  Due to heightened security, all mail that bears postage stamps and weighs more than 13 ouces must be taken by the customer to a retail service counter at a Post Office.  Failure to do so will result in the return of your mailpiece.

    This reads: Attention: 13-Ounce Rule. Stamped Mail over 13 Ounces Prohibited. Due to heightened security, all mail that bears postage stamps and weighs more than 13 ouces must be taken by the customer to a retail service counter at a Post Office. Failure to do so will result in the return of your mailpiece.

    Post Office Self Service Kisosk sign. This reads: You may deposit ONLY: Domestic mail with electronic postage purchased using the Automated Postal Center weighing up to 70 lbs. Domestic mail with postage purchased online. Domestic mail with Metered postage. Stamped mail weighing less than 13 oz. Do not place stamped domestic, international, or military APO/FPO mail weighing 13 oz or more in this receptacle.  Please take this mail, in person, to a retail associate during business hours.

    This reads: You may deposit ONLY: Domestic mail with electronic postage purchased using the Automated Postal Center weighing up to 70 lbs. Domestic mail with postage purchased online. Domestic mail with Metered postage. Stamped mail weighing less than 13 oz. Do not place stamped domestic, international, or military APO/FPO mail weighing 13 oz or more in this receptacle. Please take this mail, in person, to a retail associate during business hours.

    Paperback swap was my first encounter with this 13 oz rule. At first blush it seemed that these signs were saying, “If it weighs more than 13 ounces, you must hand it to a USPS customer service associate” which had the virtue of being clear, if not reasonable. I wondered, “Why the rule?” So I went looking.

    New 13-Ounce Mail Rule to Take Effect July 30

    WASHINGTON, DC — A new Postal Service rule goes into effect next week for packages and envelopes that weigh more than 13 ounces, if they’re being mailed with only stamps as postage at a location other than a Post Office retail service counter.

    Previously, the prohibition applied to mail over 16 ounces. The change is part of ongoing security measures established by the Postal Service, in cooperation with other government agencies to keep the public, customers, employees and the U.S. Mail safe.

    That seems pretty clear. I also found this:

    Special notice — Federal Aviation Administration security guidelines are still in effect. Mail with postage paid by postage stamps (not postage meter strips) that weigh over 13 oz. must be presented to a postal clerk at a Post Office rather than deposited in a collection box. Returns meeting this description that are deposited in collection boxes will be returned to the sender.

    The signs are saying, “Security security security! Don’t blow up our planes, our post offices, or our people!”

    Then I read them more closely. It’s not that you can’t mail packages weighing more than 13 oz., it’s merely that you can’t mail them if you placed postage stamps on them. Metered mail2 can be placed into the drop box, as well as mail that you purchased a label for online at home, but not anything that you put those ever-so-convenient stamp thingies on. If you bring your 70 pound box to the kiosk without postage and meter it there, you can mail it; if you bring your 14 ounce letter with your own stamps, you’re out of luck.

    See, it’s even in that press release I mentioned above:

    New 13-Ounce Mail Rule to Take Effect July 30

    Starting Monday, July 30, customers can use one of several convenient online postage applications — available 24/7 — or an Automated Postal Center, if they wish to mail items that weigh more than 13 ounces in Postal Service collection boxes or Post Office lobby mail slots; or if they wish to leave the items for pickup by their letter carriers. Online postage applications include the Postal Service’s Click-N-Ship service on usps.com and PC Postage from an authorized USPS vendor.

    If a customer is unable to use one of the above methods to prepare and affix postage, items weighing more than 13 ounces must be presented for mailing to an employee at a Post Office retail service counter. Business customers who use postage meters may continue to use meter postage for packages of any weight and mailing method.

    Stamped2 mail = security risk; Metered mail = Ok.

    I don’t get it. Truly! I really don’t get it! I’ve been thinking about this for a few days and I cannot come up with a scenario where this makes sense. Let’s assume that security is the overriding concern; packages over 13 oz. might contain bombs and therefore must be “feel screened” by a postal employee. Why, then, allow people to meter the package rather than place stamps on it?

    Maybe it’s because if you meter it at the kiosk, they get a video of you, therefore if you’re Unabomber II, you’ll be on record and catchable. Why, then, allow people to meter the mail using an online service?

    Maybe it’s because if you purchase your shipping label online, you have to log in to an account and pay with a credit card, therefore you’re similarly catchable if you perpetrate a crime.

    Personally I think it’s all Bullshit™. I can think of easy ways to defeat my two scenarios above. Wearing hats keeps cameras from seeing you and stealing credit cards allows you to buy stuff online without identifying yourself. The prohibition against stamps seems nonsensical to me.

    My cynical view is that they’re doing this to prevent monetary loss by people shipping packages that aren’t stamped correctly, or trying to cut down on wastage by reducing the number of times they have to ship incorrectly stamped packages back to the sender. Security? I don’t buy it.

    I, of course, am subject to being wrong. If there’s a good reason for this apparent stamped vs. metered 13 oz. weirdness, I’d love to hear about it. Until then, I’ll keep saying that this is bullshit and is similarly effective as the Transportation Security Administration’s airport screening requirements.


    1I wonder how Paperback Swap makes money. Their business model doesn’t seem to include that. I never receive any advertising and there’s no fee for participation. Weird.

    2Through these lessons I’ve learned that “stamped mail” is a special subclass that only includes mail upon which you place actual stamps. Anything that receives those little stickers from the 24/7 USPS kiosks or printed postage from one of those automated postage machines is “metered mail”.

  • NASA Images

    Blogging is very inbred.

    I found this awesome post about photography from space through Bad Astronomy, who got it from Whil Wheaton. Go us. Now I get to blog about it.

    A series of photos from orbit were posted by Alan Taylor at Boston.com. They’re all awesome, but I like this one best.

    A space cruiser destroying ground targets?
    Source: Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA-Johnson Space Center. “The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth.”
    (06/11/2008 11:44:44) 1.5 Mb file here.

    This is just so science-fictiony, how can you not like it. To my eye, it looks like a battle craft is reining destruction upon a world below (it’s actually the aurora australis and lightning above Argentina). Great shot, despite the technical flaws like the blur and the pixel artifacts. Or do those make it better? Hmmm…

    This is all courtesy of the Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth, a site I’d never seen before but will probably now spend a lot of time on.

  • Indiana Jones IV: Sucking to New Limits

    There are no direct spoilers in this review but if you don’t want to know anything about the movie before you see it, don’t read

    The short and sweet of this review: “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” is the worst movie you’ll see this summer. If it’s not, God help Hollywood.

    These people are insane. These links are all glowing reviews of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. They apparently did not see the same movie as I. Either that or they were shot up with an awesome amount of smack before they let Steven Spielberg ruin their summer. What’s really crazy about the reviews is that they talk about all of the things that made the movie so bad as if they were good things. When did having superflous scenes which end up being entirely throwaway turn out to be a bonus?

    Even Rotten Tomatoes currently thinks the movie is good (78) but I’m willing to bet that the score will drop as the people who didn’t go to see it opening weekend start filing in. This is the only review that will admit an unclothed emperor and call it like it is: An action-packed flop that if it didn’t say “Indian Jones” in the title would probably not have broken $30M at the box office before being yanked.

    Why am I down on this movie so much? Am I only lashing out because a favored franchise has been violated?

    No. Not even close. This movie sucks entirely on its own merits. In fact, the film would probably have been better without Harrison Ford or all of the franchise trappings and throwaway jokes because Spielberg wouldn’t have been tempted to use them. This would have made people try to have a good movie instead of pulling scenes from the old movies and trusting them to do the job.1

    When I first heard that Indiana Jones 4 was being made I moaned and shook my head. I figured that they were going to make another “Last Crusade” and deliberately did not get my hopes up because I knew that I would be disappointed. It was too bad that I retained any expectation of a tight film because IJ4 is not it. The entire opening scene is a throwaway. Not a throwaway in the same sense that the openers of the first 3 movies were because they introduced us to important characters or plot devices. No, the entire first scene could have been cut and it wouldn’t have effected the movie. That was my first clue to the ultimate terribleness. The second clue to the ultimate terribleness was our being asked during the first conflict to suspend our disbelief not once, or twice, or even three times, but four times for different plot elements. That’s pushing it a bit far for me and that wasn’t the end of things we were expected to swallow.

    Oh my God! I’m so worked up I can’t even finish this posting. It sucked! Don’t see it! I’m so glad that Sex and the City kicked its ass this weekend.

    1 They even, to my utter horror, pulled a line straight from Han Solo. Even if they didn’t deliberately do that, they should have seen it and changed the line.

    -Ironically in the USA Today review I linked to above, they say the movie has “enough snap to satisfy” and end on an upbeat tone, but they only give it 2.5 stars. Huh? Shouldn’t that mean that the movie is mediocre?

    -At least the review from Cinematical admitted that this movie wasn’t as good as “Raiders” but they still compare it favorably with “Temple of Doom” and “Last Crusade”, something which I entirely disagree with.

  • Why TinyURL and URLTea will Kill The Internet

    Because I will never go looking for the link if I get something like this

    Internal Server Error
    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@urltea.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

    More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

    Additionally, a 500 Internal Server Error error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.