Category: Science & Space

  • I love Phil Plait

    If you don’t read Bad Astronomy, you should.

    For example, this post of his points towards another post which made my day. It’s freaking awesome. Go there. Do it now!

  • Flying Spaghetti Monster Runs Amok!

    Kansas Board of Education member Connie Morris comes face to face with his noodly appendage and was not touched.

    All Hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  • Life on Earth is 135' Long!

    This link, stolen from Pharyngula, displays the evolutionary timeline on one webpage. If you printed it out, it would be 135′ long.

    Clicking to the right over and over again gives you a feeling on just how long 3.5 billion years is.

  • Research without Research

    If you read my blog, you will see posts about Intelligent Design and its crazy way of making life very interesting.

    However, occasionally something comes along that is truly ticklish. Try this article out of The Panda’s Thumb on for size.

    It makes me wonder if the researcher, Brian Alter, didn’t do it on purpose.

  • UT Scientist Getting Hell from IDiots

    The intelligent design movement has it’s moments, and this is one of them.

    A Scientist from the University of Texas, Eric Pianka, who spoke about a possible “crash” in human population due to many reasons, has been reported to the Department of Homeland Security and is receiving death threats and unfriendly looks.

    For better coverage see Pharyngula, Austringer, or just Google.

  • Kids Picking Legs off Ants

    The NY Times today had an article entitled Wingless Gliders May Reveal the Origins of Insect Flight. I usually peruse these types of articles just to find out what’s going on that is newsworthy.

    I think the author (Elizabeth Svoboda) had a lot of fun writing this. To summarize, Dr. Stephen Yanoviak of the University of Florida, Dr. Robert Dudley of the University of California, and Dr. Michael Kaspari of the University of Florida have been studying the gliding (flight) characteristics of a wingless ant in hopes of demonstrating what pressures drove wingless insects to evolve into winged ones.

    Here are some of the quotes from the article:

    When Stephen Yanoviak visited the jungles of Panama in 1998 to study how ants forage, he found himself with some unexpected downtime. “Out of boredom, I started flicking some ants off of a tree,” he said.

    and

    The scientists’ hunch that the ants’ movements, not their body shapes, chiefly dictated their gliding paths was confirmed when they started chopping off appendages to see if the insects could still soar.

    The ants showed remarkable resilience. They coasted to controlled landings after multiple leg amputations and even after removal of their abdomens, which ordinarily comprise 30 percent of their body weight. When the researchers covered the insects’ eyes with dots of white nail polish, however, they sank to the forest floor like stones.

    It really sounds like these guys had fun doing this research!

    The results will be published in the Journal of Experimental Biology.

  • Lefties are more Dangerous!

    In this month’s Scientific American, they have a short blurb at the front speaking about lateralization of animals, which in humans manifests as right or left handedness. Here’s the link. I have no idea how long it will work, so good luck.

    The studies that it was covering were trying to determine why animals developed lateralization in the first place (not only humans, but chimps and fish are right- or left-sided), from an evolutionary standpoint.

    The main theory says that better cooperation leads to better group survival, i.e. all of the fish swimming to the left in reaction to a predator.

    Of course the main theory on why lefties exist is that group lateralization might increase survival through cooperation but it also increases competition. Therefore lefties make better predators.

    So, next time all you lefties are bumping elbows with someone at the table, just lean over and bite them and explain that it’s your survival instinct.

  • It's the Tides!

    Sunday, I was on my section of the Appalachian Trail, cleaning out waterbars and removing some blowdowns from the trail (Flat Stanley was helping out). Two very interesting things happened while I was out there.

    (more…)

  • Miss-covery Institute

    Well! What exciting news out of Ohio! The state school board removed language from the curriculum requiring “critical analysis” of evolution. I won’t get into the details, as they are better covered at The Panda’s Thumb, but there was a quote in the NY Times that floored me. Here it is.

    “It’s an outrageous slap in the face to the citizens of Ohio,” said John G. West, associate director of the Center for Science and Culture at the [Discovery] institute, referring to several polls that show public support for criticism of evolution in science classes.

    “The effort to try to suppress ideas that you dislike, to use the government to suppress ideas you dislike, has a failed history,” Mr. West said. “Do they really want to be on the side of the people who didn’t want to let John Scopes talk or who tried to censor Galileo?”

    The Discovery Instutitue using Galileo and Scopes as an example of their ideology’s persecution? That is truly spinning my head. If I could hook it up to a generator, I’m sure I could power this computer with it. Let’s review, shall we:

    • The Scopes trial focused on a man be prosecuted for violating state law by teaching evolutionary theory in the classroom.
    • Galileo was censored by the Church not because the Church didn’t believe the science, but because the Copernican worldview conflicted with the Aristotelian dogma that the heavens were perfect and unchanging. In another word: Politics.

    Of these two examples, only the second has any applicability to today’s situation, and that is only if you ignore all of the cultural developments made since the 17th century. Today, we are not in the habit of ignoring scientific evidence just because somebody told us to. We’ve had nearly 400 years to separate (sometimes successfully, sometimes not) the scientific process from the political process.

    Suffice to say, that quote amuses me.

  • Challenger, STS 51-L Remembrance

    January 26th, 2006 is the 20th anniversary of the Challenger Disaster. Seven astronauts lost their lives. Today, we remember them.

    My family and I had lived in Satellite Beach, Florida for nine years until the summer of 1985. We saw the first Space Shuttle launch, Voyager I and II, and everything in between. We moved to New Hampshire 6 months before Challenger blew up. I’m very lucky because I did not have to personally watch it explode overhead, and I would have been watching the launch.

    In a few days, we will remember Columbia from just three years ago. Once again, I lucked out because I had planned to waken in time to watch the shuttle go overhead during its reentry. Thankfully, I slept through it as NASA believes the main breakup occurred almost directly over the city I was living in at the time, Lubbock, TX.

    Hopefully, I will no longer need to be thankful for any close brushes with aerospace disaster. NASA needs to develop a more dependable crew module for ascent and descent; one which is intelligently conceived and prosecuted, unlike the space shuttle program. A program with a lot more bang for our buck.