The Evil Eyebrow

We are in Newry, Maine for a baby shower with Jenn’s family and some friends who’ve come up to join up. I went out for a stroll this afternoon and here are some pictures of the place where Jenn grew up.

There are tools to help you produce documents. These tools are varied and a lot of them center around grammar and spell checking. Most text editing programs come with spell check of some sort in order to keep you from sending misspelled words out into the world. Of course, these spell checkers have contributed to a profusion of homonymic misspellings (their/there/they’re, four/for) and most grammar checkers won’t be able to fix it if you use the wrong word (definitely/defiantly). This illustrates the importance of proofreading, and especially the importance of having someone else do the proofreading for you, but that’s another blog post.

Another important reason to not fully depend on the tools is because they’re not fully dependable. The image here is a screen capture from a Microsoft Word document I’m working on. Notice how “descritpion” has the squiggly red underline? It didn’t have that five minutes ago. That particular word has been misspelled through three drafts of this document because, for some reason, MS Word didn’t recognize it as misspelled.

Why? I have no idea. While the program was still refusing to acknowledge that it was misspelled, I checked the custom dictionary and did some Google searches—nothing to be had there. I tried forcing the spell check to check the word—nope. Finally, I deleted the space between it and the word prior to it, then reinserted it and [poof], it’s misspelled according to MS Word. Obviously, the program was barfing on this one word for some reason.

I did not catch this. It took my boss noting that I should spell check my documents before submitting them (and me head-scratching because, well, I do) before the problem was noted. The lesson here is that there is no substitute for the Mark I Eyeball. Use it, and don’t look like a doofus.

The husband of my friend Kim Bosco was recently promoted to First Sergeant which is just ever so slightly a big freaking deal. If you don’t know why this is a big deal, spend a bit of time googling around and you’ll understand.

Go read it from the horse’s mouth and drop some congrats for 1SG Bosco!

I was at the Janke Studios a few weeks ago for an iron pour. The photo set is here.

I realize this is a good problem to have, but I am singularly incapable of figuring out how much tax to pay every year in order to have a $0 balance between state and federal income tax when I file.

Every single year since 2008 we’ve owed taxes and each time I’ve sat down and done the math to figure out how much additional deduction each pay period is required to make that magical $0 number. Every single year I’ve not managed this trick. In fact, the last two years I’ve failed this process so badly that there’s been a scramble to find the cash to pay the IRS. Mostly this is because our gross income has continuously gone up since 2007. Like I said, a good problem, but it is still frustrating.

I’m sure I’m not alone in this frustration. It should be a simple calculation to figure out how much tax we will owe at the end of the year and ensure that the correct amount is being withheld from our (joint) paychecks. Obviously it’s not that simple, or I’m incapable of managing it’s simpleness. Take your pick.

So, once again I’m going to devote time trying to figure out our 2013 tax liability in advance, which will be complicated by the new addition to the household due in late July, and that we expect some changes in our overall gross income for this tax year. Wish me luck as I spend time being an uncompensated tax (un)professional.

I bought a new tool today; I’m very happy with it. This is what it looks like after the first two hours of use in a pollen-rich environment.

With my back issues ongoing, I’m not in shape to do any significant raking, so I splurged for the most powerful leaf blower that The Home Depot¹ had on the shelf. This is the Echo PB-500T and I spent $300 on it. A wonderful $300.

The previous leaf blower I owned was a Homelite and I economized a bit on price when I purchased it. Alas, I regret that decision. Like hard drives, you’ll always need more than you think from a leaf blower. I would classify it after several years of use as “slightly anemic” and while it would do the job, it just couldn’t handle all that I wanted it to (thus the needing to rake).

Fortunately, the Homelite died and forced me to get a new blower. Knowing I needed more oomph than previous, I didn’t flinch at price, and I’m glad I did. I spent two hours blowing a winter’s worth of crap and leaves to places where I don’t mind them being, and now I feel like my yard doesn’t hate me. Which is important if you’ve ever seen Poltergeist. It’s also important because I wouldn’t have been able to do a lot of the work I did today with the old leaf blower, and thus would have had to hire someone. Therefore, I saved at least $100 already. This is how I justify my purchases.

The one issue I have with the Echo so far is that it randomly stopped, twice. If it continues to do that I’ll post about it.

An interesting aside is that the Homelite I owned was rated for 400 cubic feet per minute (cfm) at 170 mph while this Echo is rated at 450 cfm at 162 mph. If these numbers are accurate (and I have no method of evaluating that) then that extra 50 cfm makes a huge deal. I estimate that this blower is at least a third again more effective than the old one.

1. With Jenn working for THD, I’m required to use the full correct name. [↩]

Jenn and I attended the 2013 Braves home opener last Monday. The Braves beat the Phillies 7 to 5 with three home runs. It was a fun game to watch.

I took some pics. Here’s a selection. More can be found at my flickr account.

The groundskeeper spent a good 20 minutes crafting the lines around home plate before the game. He was meticulous. Precise. 10 minutes into play it looked like this.

Baby’s first baseball game.

When the Kiss Cam™ came on, I told Jenn that if they focused on us, I was going to kiss the girl next to me on the other side. Said girl giggled.

When the Braves came on the field, they blew a buch of streamers in the outfield to celebrate. The streamers remained, dangling from the TV cameras, for the rest of the game.

I’m desperately looking forward to the time when, during the first year of life of our child, I’m asked how old he is and I get to answer, “Zero.” That will make my day.

In anticipation of that wondrous experience, here are some more pictures of Jenn. She’s at 23 weeks in this picture. Contrast these with the last set we took five weeks ago.

During the shoot, Apollo decided he wanted some attention. He didn’t stick around or we would have a better shot of Jenn and Apollo together.

“My life is ennui; growing this baby has me casting for validation.”

There’s a baby in here!

When I was learning about dependent and independent variables in experimentation, I had the hardest time remember which was which. To this day I have to take a moment to make sure I’m describing or graphing something correctly. At the age of 39, and as a practicing engineer, I still have a bit of trouble with this. I blame this on poor teaching, or poor learning¹ but I have found the best graph to simplify everything!

Jessica Hagy does wonderful and funny index card graphs and diagrams at her blog Indexed. This one perfectly teaches where the variables need to go (although it doesn’t help with remembering what is independent and what is dependent).

There are two ways you could read this graph:

1. As the number of Chihuahuas go up, the number of Eagles go down, obviously due to rampant little yappy-dogs armed with stinger missiles.
2. As the number of Eagles go up, the number of Chihuahuas go down, due to eagles eating the yappy things.

One of those items is wrong and one is right. If you can remember the way that graph is drawn, you now have the perfect mnemonic because I don’t think you’ll need a reminder that Eagles eat Chihuahuas, rather than vice versa.

I will haul this out the next time I have to explain dependence to someone.

1. Probably best to blame it on poor learning if you knew me in high school [↩]

Over time I’ve had several posts on Idimager the most recent of which was my learning that Idimager is now dead software, to be replaced by Photo Supreme.

As I have an enormous amount of time invested in tagging and organizing images in Idimager, I am not about to make the jump lightly; I need to know if key features in  Idimager are still supported. The most important are:

• Easy image tagging
• Easy file management

I have a number of other custom-built items in Idimager (batch exports for various purposes to various places, automatic downloads from various folders for various reasons, custom recipes for altering and managing images) but I’m not as worried about those. It’s the two bullet points that are the killers.

From reading blog posts and making inquiries and checking the Photo Supreme forums, It seems that Photo Supreme continues Idimager’s legacy of easy and efficient tagging of images. Unfortunately, from the same forum, I learn that Photo Supreme does not do internal file and folder management (yet) and that kills if for me right now. From the forum sticky: (requires log in)

Tip 1: How to update catalog’s reference of resource paths when moving images on file-sytem:
a. outside of PSU, physically move or copy the current folder to the new location (e.g. from local disk to external harddisk, one local drive to another, or one area of file system to another)
b. in PSU, choose “By Folder” for Catalog view
c. right-click on the folder you just moved and select “Relocate Folder…” [ed. emphasis]
d. in the navigation dialog which opens, select the new location of the folder
e. verify by right-clicking on a thumbnail available in this new location and select “Locate in Windows Explorer”
f. if the option is available (it is greyed out when the media is disconnected) then the image should open and you know the catalog has updated the resource location

Note the emphasized item above. To relocate a folder I would have to individually find it in the new location. This destroys Photo Supreme’s utility for my particular case. Why?

I have a laptop that is my main computer. It has a 400 GB hard drive. 400 GB is a lot, but not nearly enough to contain all of my images. As it fills up, I regularly move the images out to an external hard drive (which has 2 TB). I store images by year/day folder arrangement to make it easy if I’m searching for a particular date in the file system. Photo Supreme isn’t getting a test drive because as of today, March 24, 2013, I’ve got 73 folders under the “2013” folder which would need to be individually relocated once I moved them to the external hard drive.

No thanks.

I could always move the entire “2013” folder at the end of the year, but I can’t guarantee that I won’t run out of space before then, and I’m unwilling to experiment to see what happens when I move the “2013” folder, and then dump a bunch of new folders into the moved “2013” folder later.

My principal philosophy here is that I’m unwilling to be a paying beta tester for the software, and I’m also unwilling to abandon a software I know works for something I don’t think will. So for now, I’m sticking with Idimager. That’s unfortunate because I have a nice 50% off discount for Photo Supreme sitting in my inbox.

Alas, I will wait until this software has matured a bit more. Photo Supreme is supposed to be an “integrated photo cataloging and photo management [software]…” but until it truly is, I’ll stick with the old.

PS. There’s an argument to be made in favor of Photo Supreme that no one has weighed in on, and I’m unwilling to be the tester: Would the time savings inside the software (Photo supreme is supposed to be way faster than Idimager) be sufficient to justify individually relocating hundreds of folders?